❰PDF / Epub❯ ✅ Classic Christianity Author Thomas C. Oden – Transportjobsite.co.uk

Classic Christianity quotes Classic Christianity , litcharts Classic Christianity , symbolism Classic Christianity , summary shmoop Classic Christianity , Classic Christianity ca734637 For The First Time, Thomas Oden S Systematic Theology Classic Series Individually Titled The Living God, The Word Of Life, And Life In The Spirit Is Available In One Complete Volume A Renowned Theologian, Oden Provides A Consensus View Of The Christian Faith, Delving Deeply Into Ancient Christian Tradition And Bringing To The Contemporary Church The Best Wisdom From Its Past In This Magisterial Work, Oden Tackles The Central Questions Of Christian Belief And The Nature Of The TrinityWritten For Clergy, Christian Educators, Religious Scholars, And Lay Readers Alike, Classic Christianity Provides The Best Synthesis Of The Whole History Of Christian Thought Part One Explores The Most Intriguing Questions Of The Study Of God Does God Exist Does Jesus Reveal God Is God Personal, Compassionate, Free And Presents Answers That Reflect The Broad Consensus Culled From The Breadth Of The Church S Teachers It Is Rooted Deeply And Deliberately In Scripture But Confronts The Contemporary Mind With The Vitality Of The Christian Tradition Part Two Addresses The Perplexing Christological Issues Of Whether God Became Flesh, Whether God Became Christ, And Whether Christ Is The Source Of Salvation Oden Details The Core Beliefs Concerning Jesus Christ That Have Been Handed Down For The Last Two Hundred Decades, Namely, Who He Was, What He Did, And What That Means For Us Today Part Three Examines How The Work Of God In Creation And Redemption Is Being Brought To Consummation By The Holy Spirit In Persons, Through Communities, And In The Fullness Of Human Destiny Oden S Magisterial Study Not Only Treats The Traditional Elements Of Systematical Theology But Also Highlights The Foundational Exegetes Throughout History Covering The Ecumenical Councils And Early Synods The Great Teachers Of The Eastern Church Tradition, Including Athanasius And John Chrysostom And The Prominent Western Figures Such As Augustine, Ambrose, Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, And John Calvin, This Book Offers The Reader The Fullest Understanding Of The Christian Faith Available

10 thoughts on “Classic Christianity

  1. says:

    Oden sets out to provide a consensus view on the Christian faith, which is an incredibly challenging goal Many would scoff and say there is no consensus view I imagine liberal Christians reading this would not find an accurate representation of their understanding I read this book in chunks, so I read the beginning last January, but I recall Oden s consensus view relies heavily on the early church So it is not a consensus view that all who call themselves Christians would agree on in 2016, he argues it is the consensus of what all orthodox Christians believed in, say, 500 AD.I would say Oden succeeds at his task This book is thorough and detailed He covers all the necessary ground I wish I had read this one back in seminary rather than Grenz s Theology for the Community of God I liked Grenz s work, but I think Oden does for training Christian pastors That is because the way he connects everything he says not just to scripture but to the early church This book helps you realize, again and again, that the church does not just reinvent its teaching every generation but is a tradition following from scripture through history.That said, Oden is a bit idealistic There were moments when I expected him to lay out different Christian views and who held which and why they disagreed election, Lord s supper, etc and he often did not This wouldn t be a problem except many Christians would say that what Oden puts forth as the consensus view of free will and predestination is not consensus and this quotes from Augustine and Calvin are weighted to support his view but not theirs Further, I know I am a poodle barking at a mastiff, but I think there was diversity in the early church then Oden lets on One might be Gregory of Nyssa and Origen s universalism Sure they were the minority, but their view was their Gregory played a huge role in the teaching of the Trinity, so its not like they were fringe either.It seems most of the disagreement comes up in the third part, on the Holy Spirit The first book, on God the Father, and the second, on Jesus, were places where the early centuries did have consensus yes Nestorians and Monophysites, we see you waving The Spirit section dealt with issues that it seems Christians have always disagreed on Maybe Oden noted that and I just forget, after all it has been a long year That said, this is still a fantastic book Anyone who wants a grasp of general Christian theology with a huge helping of early church fathers as well as a small helping of medieval and Reformers, should check this one out.

  2. says:

    Classic Christianity is arguably the most helpful systematic theology text I have ever read Oden s purpose in laying this out is not to present his own positions, but rather to attempt to summarize the theological consensus of the Early Church.While the book is highly readable in its own right, its primary strength is as a resource it references, I believe, nearly twenty thousand various sources from throughout the history of the church As a result, while the book itself is illuminating and helps to provide an ecumenical consensus of the Christian faith that the majority of Christians everywhere can agree on, its true value lies in the way that it is able to direct people towards a large variety of primary sources This is particularly important since the book was written in the context of Protestantism, where often little to no attention is paid to pre Reformation history This book serves to introduce readers coming from this environment to some of the most significant figures of the Christian faith such as Athanasius, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Basil, and many others.While the book is largely beneficial, it is not entirely without flaws First, one must remember that no individual is without bias, and as a result, it would be impossible for Oden or anyone, for that matter to undertake a matter this great and avoid presenting a consensus where there was none In other words, take this book with a grain of salt not every position presented here was without prominent, orthodox detractors within the church Additionally, there is perhaps a tad too much emphasis placed upon later figures, such as Aquinas, Luther, and Calvin While it is helpful to see how the teachings of the early church correspond to recent thinkers, when some of these theologians are the only ones being cited to support a particular claim, it casts doubt upon the doctrine s acceptance in the early church.These objections aside, Classic Christianity remains an excellent resource for both theology and the early works of the Christian church, and is highly recommended to clergy, leaders, and lay people alike.

  3. says:

    Oden s three volume systematic theology, now in one volume, effectively summarizes the consensus fidelium As a Wesleyan, he does not simply dismiss those with whom he has differing view points, but shows where common ground exists He also inspires the reader to want to study the church fathers and other great teachers within the Christian tradition I highly recommend the work.

  4. says:

    An incredible work based on early church sources, this systematic theology will be labeled Arminian though it quotes Calvin and Luther extensively as well as numerous early church sources Oden s systematic theology is easy to read, but its extensive nature will make it less accessible I especially appreciated his work on divine happiness, his discussion of the gifts of the spirit, and his reporting of early church consensus on controversial issues I felt that I learned as much or from this text as I did from the previous systematic theologies I have read He focuses on major doctrines, and I appreciated the constant citation of early church sources That said, I must remain skeptical of what he reports as consensus The church fathers have been subject to so much quote mining, and many scholars torture the early church fathers into a consensus that comfortably resembles current evangelicalism That doesn t make this work any less excellent, but I will use it as an indicator in further research into early church thought rather than a completely trustworthy summary.

  5. says:

    A systematic theology with the parameters of explaining the less controversial consensual beliefs of the Christianity s broad traditions streams A valuable resource of theological history, and I appreciated its ecumenical quality.

  6. says:

    In my top two 1 volume theology books.

  7. says:

    After dabbling in general theology for several years and doing intense study into a small handful of particular areas, I decided it was time to take on the challenge of reading a full blown systematic theology that is, an orderly, comprehensive exposition of the most important points of Christian doctrine There are lots to choose from, including many that will boldly present the particulars of a given tradition especially the Reformed tradition, in my experience as biblical truth rather than tentative belief I sought to avoid such dogmatism and thus landed with Oden s Classic Christianity I was pleased with the outcome Though this was no light read it took me several months to work through in my spare time.The brilliant thing about Oden s work here is that he is sworn to the promise of unoriginality Rather than presenting his own particular views, Oden has consciously mined the vast body of historic Christian literature in an effort to set forth what is most commonly stated in the central Christian tradition concerning God Almost every sentence comes with an attached parenthetical citation Oden s pyramid of sources starts with Scripute as the primary base, followed in order of significance by writers from the first few centuries of the Church both East and West , then medieval writers, and only then the writers of the Reformation and recent times When he cites recent writers such as Karl Barth or controversial ancient figures such as Origen on particular issues, he does so only if they have stated the wide ranging consensus view better than others Oden is also sensitive to areas such as atonement theory and eschatology where the consensus view is harder to identify, simply presenting the different views that have been widely put forward without favoring any one view over another In these ways the reader is exposed to the best of the Christian tradition, even where that tradition is somewhat diverse While none of the doctrinal content was surprising to me, what was surprising was just how clearly the ancient writers had articulated their beliefs and how thoroughly they had anticipated and addressed issues that are still important for students of the Christian tradition today Oden shows convincingly that, with very few exceptions, there is nothing new under the sun, and that the Christian tradition has always had adequate resources to handle its own defense I now have much interest in the ancient writings and hope to dip my feet in the works of St Augustine and Gregory of Nyssa in the near future.Oden s work is split into three volumes along Trinitarian lines The Living God, The Word of Life, and Life in the Spirit Within these headers, the particulars of Christian doctrine are dealt with in the order that they often appear in the ancient creeds My favorite part about this organization was that Oden explained the Christian conception of God in personal terms as the very same Yahweh revealed in the Bible before handling the abstract question of whether God exists This turns the modern mode of organizing the subject matter on its head, and in so doing it helpfully clarifies the uniquely Judeo Christian conception of God, and lends extra plausibility to the existence of such a God.There were many other helpful insights along the way When talking about the Incarnation, Oden rightly points out that Christian doctrine is offensive in part because of the scandal of particularity What he means is that Jesus was a particular person, of a particular race and gender, living in a particular time and place in real human history While it is true that Jesus experienced everything common to man, this need not mean that Jesus experienced literally every conceivable human experience taking on every race, gender, place, and time, etc in fact, such a comprehensive experience is not common to man, and thus would have robbed Jesus of His solidarity with us Rather, a universal part of our human experience is that we are tied to many particulars, and thus so was Jesus Another helpful point was that, just as Adam and Eve shared in the disobedience that resulted in the Fall, so Jesus and His mother Mary share in an obedience which resulted in the Redemption The fact that the Savior was a man born of woman shows that God was concerned to fully honor both sexes in His plan of redemption, even though they played different roles within that plan.This is a highly recommended book for any who are interested in systematic theology I will certainly be using it as a helpful resource in the future

  8. says:

    Where to start with this book Oden shifted his views from mainline to conservative Christianity, with a corresponding interest in the ancient Fathers of the church The result as presented here is a systematic theology of sorts, though anyone with much knowledge at all of the Fathers can see this book is a mishmash of quotations, a Herculean effort designed to reassure the anxiety of evangelicals who want desperately to believe their views were the views of the original church.

  9. says:

    It s hard to review a book like this It s a dense comprehensive theology text which I read in preparation for a class I have nothing to compare it to but it was readable not so technical it was completely over my head Funny story not the day I finished it I learned the professor changed the text for the class I ll have a different one to read, oh well.

  10. says:

    Finished this boring monster The content is mostly fine, but I have to say that it made me never want to read another book on systematic theology again I m also not sure who I would recommend this to it s not overly academic, but I don t know of any layperson who would find it helpful One to skip.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *